We are alone. The interaction we have with our fellow human beings is nothing more than fiction, because to be significant as prone to a variety of meanings, to speak more than one language is more than plausible. Despite this phenomenon, human beings come to agreements to be social beings, we need this interaction and usually people get together to build one than anything else. This phenomenon (the possibility of communication between people) call it the Air
Issuer Like Me the chocolate pudding of
Receiver
Within the message there are three words that have a display abstract to understand the message. For the sender and the receiver, the three words have a dimension that goes beyond the meaning of each, and used to encode or decode the message. In both processes there is a trap, as the pudding is not coded in the same way it is built, therefore the relations (syntagmatic calls) vary causing disagreements, which are implicit, the words take on this character but is blocked and rare Once both communication partners notice it. Thus, for both the three words have connotations different
| | Transmitter Receiver |
|
| Gustar | nice light to an object. sensuous pleasure causing | Value pleasure-taste. Sex-pleasure relationship. |
| Pudding | sweet dish usually served for dessert. | Dessert , which has a watery texture. |
| Chocolate | exquisite taste found in Latin | Chocolate = aphrodisiac poop color. |
raised this point, assuming that the recipient is a person with certain psychological disorders and traumas of childhood, we assume that for him / her sex is something dirty, but it takes into account long believed that all people who approach him seeking potentially so (ie happens, it is not so rare in reality). Then this receptor, gathering all these words syntagmatically and fetched a deduction may think that your transmitter you are very delicately hinting he wants to have with him / her a coprophilous relationship.
We know, however, that communication is indeed possible, and that this case-if it were to occur, would be extremely rare. But that person A will head passes all these ideas (though not revealed due to the codes of communication) is more plausible. How many times we ideas that everyone is against us or assume that someone has something against us out of nothing?
Communication between two thinking beings is thanks to the Universe of
The Universe of transmission is composed of the sun at its most basic form, and all objects that remind us to think only of the object itself, not the layers of paint that we have given for all our lives. This language is not ours is a language of the same nature as comes implicit and without it no civilization could exist as the only vehicle interaction
is why, in the example above, although there is a receptor crazier with some approaches so rare, their reaction maximum, will be something like: "No, I do not like." Because we know this world is not only social rules, but less artificialised language and more concrete. If we could communicate only through these codes would not have even a single misunderstanding. We would be a major biological computer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment